Rush, PA and Brady, R, “What is wrong with Cantor's diagonal argument?”, Logique Et Analyse, 51 (1) pp. 185-219. ISSN 0024-5836 (2008) [Refereed Article] |
Data Type | Value |
Type of Research | Pure Basic Research |
Research Division | Philosophy and Religious Studies |
Research Group | Philosophy |
Research Field | Logic |
Research Objective Division | Expanding Knowledge |
Research Objective Group | Expanding knowledge |
Research Objective Field | Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies |
Visit Item on eCite | http://ecite.utas.edu.au/74358 |
Scopus Source URL | View the full record on Scopus |
Scopus Citing URL | View the list of citing articles on Scopus |
Number of Times Cited | 10 |
Number of Downloads | 297 |